On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > > I'm afraid its me again, still failing to understand the projects' > > protocols. Last week I posted the attached patch or cpio to the patches > > list (fixes CAN-1999-1575 (!), CAN-2005-1111, CAN-2005-1229). > > > > Apparently, I need to raise the issue on this list. > > The best way to get our attention is to create a new bug. There is a > lot of traffic and things on other lists sometimes get missed. Bugs are > permanent until resolved and can even be reviewed after they are closed. > > We use -dev to discuss but even those issues are not always tracked. BZ > is the way to go. > > -- Bruce >
ACK for security issues, I now appreciate I should have done that last week. The response I got implied that all blfs-related patches need to be aired on blfs-dev so that a blfs-editor can commit them to patches if they choose. Maybe I misread it. Maybe policy has changed. Ken -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
