Archaic wrote these words on 11/02/05 11:34 CST: > I just realized a possible problem. I was about to update the dhcpcd > package and started wondering about SBU timing differences between > gcc-3.4.4 and gcc-4.0.2 and if I would be using an invalid timing.
>From what I've noticed, there is very little difference between SBU timings with the LFS version that has GCC-3.4.4 and GCC-4.0.x. The combination of GCC/binutils/Glibc between recent LFS versions seemed to produce very close SBU timings. > Then > I realized that compilation problems might hit with gcc-4 and not gcc-3. > I do not have a current lfs-svn system, so I'm going to unassign myself > from dhcpcd. This one *is* important. I'm not sure editors should update packages until it is known to build successfully using the target toolchain. For SVN, that would include GCC-4.0.x. You probably did the right thing by not updating the package until you are certain it can compile using GCC-4.0.x. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 11:38:59 up 38 days, 21:03, 3 users, load average: 0.05, 0.14, 0.26 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
