El Lunes, 28 de Noviembre de 2005 16:33, Bruce Dubbs escribió: > Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > > Well, if you're concerned about disrupting automation, the prompt for > > the choice could come right away, as soon as you enter make. It could > > traverse the dependencies and make sure all necessary choices are made. > > Yes, this would be a nice option. When given a choice, take both. :) > > How about a switch/configuration option that would specify: > > CHOICE=default or CHOICE=prompt This could also be overridden by > additional variables: > > MTA=postfix|sendmail|exim > X=xorg|xfree86 > KERBEROS=heimdal|krb5 > > other options could be > > QT=/opt|/usr > KDE=/opt|/usr > > I'd also consider a variable > > OPTIONAL=packageA,packageB,... > > That would add in optional dependencies as desired by the user. > > These are the main alternative packages/options that I can remember off > the top of my head. I'd have to go through the book to get a > comprehensive list, but we are just talking concepts right now. > > -- Bruce
-- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
