Miguel Bazdresch wrote these words on 01/23/06 21:58 CST: > Wow... Randy, the only purpose of my nitpicking is to maybe be helpful. > And that's what it is, just nitpicking.
You have always been helpful to me. Always. I'm sorry I didn't recognize your intentions, and try to say things a bit more smoothly. I just get in such a hurry, and I know if we were sitting face to face discussing this, you would know by my tone and delivery, that I was being appreciative, yet critical at the same time. You would have had no issue with our discussion. The Internet is so difficult about trying to pass along tone and delivery. > In the Gimp page, Gimp-print is recommended, but it is not an essential > package. I would argue it's on the same level as GnuPG for thunderbird. And *wow* back to you! :-) This whole recommendation thing started a month or so back when another Editor added Gimp-print to the Gimp page as a recommended dependency and I asked why. There was quite a bit of discussion about it. Bottom line from the editor who put it in there was: "because I felt it was proper." Yes, subjectiveness was discussed. > Again, wow. I wish I knew why I deserve such a response... My apologies if this came off too strong. Miguel, you have always been a supporter, and I appreciate that. Please know that I have always taken your messages in the highest regard. > Neither me nor the BLFS editors have one, so I'll just STFU. Please don't. Your opinion is valued. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 22:02:00 up 121 days, 7:26, 3 users, load average: 0.90, 0.35, 0.25 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
