Am Dienstag, 31. Januar 2006 23:52 schrieb Randy McMurchy: > Rainer.wirtz wrote these words on 01/31/06 13:43 CST: > > Check them (and k3b) out with > > svn co svn://anonsvn.kde.org/home/kde/trunk/extragear/multimedia > > Not to argue, but because I'm actually curious, why would I consider > using SVN versions of k3b for instance, when the most recent stable > tarball is barely more than a month old. Have new features been > added?
k3b has some more options in the cd-ripper dialog plus a cddb-lookup button. What really has changed a lot is kaffeine. > If we are going to seriously look at packages for inclusion in the > BLFS book, shouldn't we be looking at, and testing, the 'stable' > versions? Sure, I just thought it'd be interresting to have a look at the stable versions of tomorrow. Although they're in trunk, all three progs are pretty stable, I use them daily (the SVN version). But to be true, I use svn for everything kde (branches/3.5 mostly) and tarballs just didn't cross my mind. Rainer -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
