On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 11:42:32 -0800 "Dan Nicholson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/19/06, Hugo Villeneuve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 11:44:08 -0700 > > Archaic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ultimately, though, this needs to be > > > sent upstream. > > > > This is the solution I came up with, to fix the problem at the source > > (Makefile.am) and also in the autoconf generated Makefile.in by using a > > patch. > > I keep ignoring the upstream aspect, but let's try to get something > together. Hugo, your patch is right, but you don't need to adjust > Makefile.in. Once you run autogen.sh, Makefile.in will be regenerated > with the proper @HAVE_DOXYGEN_TRUE@ tags in front of the relevant > targets. Dan, you are right that modification to Makefile.in is not necessary if the patch is sent upstream. The reason I include it is to be able to build the patched package without having to call "autogen.sh", since I'm using a common shell script to build my BLFS packages. Hugo. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
