Archaic wrote: > On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 12:01:33AM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote: >> Choices: >> >> 1. Update the book and place a warning message that SVN doesn't play >> nicely using the current LFS and BLFS version of BDB. > > I like this option, especially in light of the recommendation by > upstread to use fsfs. Anyone who refuses to dump/reload shouldn't be > updating to 1.3.0 from 1.2.x anyway, so that should make this choice a > little easier.
I don't remember... Are there any changes to the build instructions between BDB 4.3.x and 4.4.x? If not, we can possibly put in a note that the user regress to 4.3.x if they *really* want subversion and BDB. I don't know if that breaks other packages though. Do we have any clues about when svn 1.3.1 will be released? -- Bruce BTW, I gotta go now. I've got a lot of stuff I need to do tomorrow. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
