Dan Nicholson wrote: > On 4/4/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 16:58 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: >> >>> Assuming the patch works as advertised, how should the change be >>> implemented? If the patch is deemed too large, we can always use the >>> development snapshot: >> I've never heard anyone was worried that a "patch was too large". Heck, >> if it works, run with it. > > That's good to hear. As far as I can tell, it does work. Unless > there are no objections, I will commit this tomorrow. Later we can > have a discussion on whether slrn or Tin or both should be included in > the book as UTF-8 aware console newsreaders. > > -- > Dan
My two-pennies. Although I reported it failing to build, and subsequently built their snapshot, I found that I didn't like the package, so I can't help validate it for you. Sorry. I'm afraid my atrophied old brain can't remember keystrokes any more, so I had to go back to the dead-rodent. :-) R. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
