Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 04/28/06 19:27 CST: > Now this doesn't mean I *know* what is right. I'm just making an > educated guess. In the absence of other evidence, I would trust the > package author.
Not me. Anyone who expects his source tree to be kept on the system doesn't gain my trust. Jeez, I hope you don't have daughters at a sensitive age (I know you have grown ones). But your level of trust is a bit more than mine. :-) I will dig up evidence. I'm thinking that if anything in the header matches anything in the library file, it would be broken if the header was not available to packages linking to the Tcl library. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.28] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 19:29:00 up 34 days, 7:06, 1 user, load average: 0.10, 0.08, 0.08 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page