Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 05/12/06 20:00 CST: > Looking at the outstanding tickets, xchat is one of the oldest. It > seems to be a relatively simple CMMI application,
Though I meant to, it didn't happen, but I wanted to comment that perhaps this is the oldest bug in the list because every time an Editor looked at it, and knew it was nothing but CMMI, and there was no BLFS dependency for it, it was just a waste of time. :-) I could make 100 legitimate bugs right now, for good packages that have have BLFS dependencies (perhaps indirectly) and install via CMMI, or perhaps a variance here and there with the config or docs, but do we want that in the BLFS book? I'm all for including as much as possible, but for CMMI with no BLFS dependencies, wouldn't a page listing these types of packages in each section, or the wiki, be a better value for us. Though I must say, there has been more Editor activity in updating packages in the recent past than probably ever before. Perhaps this trend can continue, and more packages can be handled timely. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.27] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 20:31:01 up 12:31, 3 users, load average: 0.12, 0.51, 1.06 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
