On Σαβ, Φεβ 10, at 12:02 Randy McMurchy wrote: > Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote these words on 02/10/07 11:55 CST: > > > Well,just see the "Dead links" ticket,which had worked quite well-I am > > speaking > > about the same kind of thing here. > > Wrong links and typos are good candidates for permanents tickets. > > > > Maybe with a little advertisement in the "Getting Involved" page - a > > pointer to those tickets (each for every release) - will be more easy for > > people > > who wants to contribute,at least for typos and Links. > > First of all this should be discussed on -dev with a proper Subject: > line.
Ok here it is. > Secondly, if what Ag is suggesting and Dan agreed with is > lumping a bunch of typos/dead links/whatever into one ticket and > keeping it open until all are resolved (even if that means other > issues are added to it while it is open), then fine. > Actually,this is exactly what I was thinking. And this is what Dan said: I agree with what you're saying about permanent tickets. It's just nice to collect a bunch of little things in one spot. Randy McMurchy wrote: > But if what is being suggested is that even if all the issues in a > ticket have been resolved, and then the ticket isn't closed, then > I lean the other way. I just can't see what's wrong with opening a > new ticket. I like looking at recently entered tickets to see what > may be "hot" (simply looking at the list as I sort it by ticket > number). By all means, however, a discussion could provoke better > ideas that could be implemented. > Ideas of course by smarter people than us,are more than welcomed. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
