On Thu, Mar 08, at 12:22 Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 07, at 04:02 Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> The reason we put the vimrc file in BLFS was that the treatment was so > >> thin in LFS. At the time we didn't have a vim page in BLFS. > > > > Oh I see,that make sense yes. > > But I don't know if that make sense today. > > I think it does. To me, the only reason to go to the BLFS vim page is > if you want gvim. Customization of LFS without building new packages > goes in Chapter 3. >
Oh yes,now I understand your logic.Yes I guess you are right. I will create the ticket just to update the page then,unless someone has a good reason to move the vimrc contents into the vim.xml. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
