On 4/15/07, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I did notice that the HTML files are restructured in the doc
> directory and already properly formatted. Additionally, there were
> instances of calling rman in the install.log file of 1.7, yet in
> the new 1.9 version, references to rman are not there.
>
> Seems safe to remove the rman dependency. Anyone see it differently?
Haven't built it, but I see this throughout the doc directory:
all:: AuAnyEvent.$(MANSUFFIX).html
AuAnyEvent.$(MANSUFFIX).html: AuAnyEvt.$(MANNEWSUFFIX)
$(RM) AuAnyEvent.$(MANSUFFIX).html AuAnyEvent.$(MANSUFFIX)-html
$(RMAN) $(RMANOPTIONS) < AuAnyEvt.$(MANNEWSUFFIX) \
> AuAnyEvent.$(MANSUFFIX)-html && $(MV)
AuAnyEvent.$(MANSUFFIX)-html $@
...
It looks like it's gonna call $(RMAN) to generate the html file as
part of the default build. But you don't see calls to rman anywhere?
--
Dan
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
