Thanks for the input. On 4/26/07, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 04/26/07 02:25 CST: > > > Index: general.ent > > =================================================================== > > --- general.ent (revision 6756) > > +++ general.ent (working copy) > > @@ -180,7 +180,8 @@ > > <!ENTITY sysstat-version "7.0.4"> > > <!ENTITY apache-ant-version "1.7.0"> > > <!ENTITY dbus-version "0.62"> > > -<!ENTITY hal-version "0.5.7.1"> > > +<!ENTITY hal-version "0.5.9"> > > +<!ENTITY hal-info-version "20070425"> > > I think it might be better to put the hal-info-version in the actual > HAL instructions. This is how it is in most package instructions. I've > been meaning to fix the JDK instructions but always forget to do it.
OK. I couldn't decide. > > + <para><parameter>--enable-docbook-docs > > + --docdir=/usr/share/doc/hal-&hal-version;</parameter>: If <xref > > + linkend="libxml2" and <ulink > url="http://cyberelk.net/tim/xmlto/";>xmlto</ulink> > > + are available, these parameters enable the > <application>HAL</application> > > + specification documentation to be built.</para> > > + > > Here is your error: the unterminated xref in the third line (need a > /> after the "libxml2"). I'm so retarded. It kept coming back with that error and I just kept looking at the dependencies section where it was properly formatted. Oh, well. I have a couple changes to make on dbus that Bruce and others suggested. I have to test out the "make check && make clean", but I think it's safe. Are you still handling the bindings? Should I commit the dbus change? -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
