Dan Nicholson wrote: > On 8/20/07, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Dan Nicholson wrote: >>> Is configure not shipped, or does running `make' force autoconf to >>> run? The packaging of xfsprogs is misguided, but reading the top level >>> Makefile might lead to a shortcut to not running autoconf. >> Running autoconf is needed, because the Makefile uses the host's >> libtool. Mismatches between autoconf and libtool usually lead to bad >> results. So the real mistake is either not shipping a private copy of >> libtool, or shipping the configure script ar all. > > Good point, and it may explain why I had a lot of linking issues with > xfsprogs a while back. >
I'll remove the sed for now. I had inconsistent success with it. --- David Jensen -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
