On Κυρ, Μάρ 02, at 02:36 Bruce Dubbs wrote: > We might just want to place a link to the ticket in the changelog. > I asked for this months ago.
Randy McMurchy wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, at 01:21 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> + ... Fixes Trac ticket #2366.</para> > >> Shall I add an entity in general.ent, as they do in LFS to make an >> actual link so to be "clickable" from the changelog entry? >> Like: >> >> <!ENTITY bfs-ticket-root "http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/bfs/ticket/";> >> > No, I would prefer not. In fact, I don't think we need to > identify that a Trac ticket is being fixed at all. To me > it would just be too much clutter having a URL in every > changelog entry. Neither I want to add a link to track when its just a normal package update; but in all other situations, yes, I find it quite useful. Maybe reconsider? -- http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/wiki/Hacking -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
