(Taking this to -book) On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 05:05:51PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote: > > Just my personal preference, but I'd like to see buildsizes rounded > to the nearest megabyte. 67.4 megabyte is just a bit too much precision > for me. *Especially* when the build size is 100mb or more. > Care to spell out your preferences ? To me, blfs has for long been somewhat pernickety about specifying sizes and SBUs in decimals. (I've always found some variation in my own build times, even for repeated builds when the cache should be "hot"). I'm happy to attempt to fit in with what I find, but a statement for "how small we ought to measure" would be useful.
ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
