On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 08:23:57AM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote: > Who is "we"? We try not to use this is the book unless it is something > the editors recommend personally. In a technical environment "we" should > be avoided if possible. How about just removing the "then we must first"?
That's just a force of habit from the way I speak. I accidentally used we before but corrected it before I submitted it. I shall correct it. > 2. "GPL Ghostscript provides many different scripts used to render > PostScript/PDF files back and forth." > > This may have been in one of the Ghostscript packages already, but it > sounds funny. Can we substitute something else for "back and forth". I > can't really think of anything offhand right now, as I'm not sure what > it really means. Well, I was actually going to write a description for each program/script, but I decided that may be a bit too much. I also decided that I didn't want to mess with text that nobody had a problem with. But if it has to be changed then I'm sure I can think of something.
pgp1Ie7Eri2hz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
