> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 01:30:48AM -0000, DJ Lucas wrote: > > Am I confident in it? I would probably say yes, I've compiled X enough > times to get a feel for when it's stable or not. The versions I used are > stable versions, such as libX11: you should use 1.2.2, rather than > 1.2.99.901 which is a development version (correct me if I'm wrong). > I've been using 1.6 for a good while before I became an editor, and > through that time I don't remember any serious issues or sudden crashes. > I think a few more people should give it a trial run, but it gets my > thumbs up.
Okay...so I'm seeing added dri2proto and updated inputproto, renderproto, randrproto, xcb-proto, lib-xcb, libX11, libxrandr, xtrans, libxrender, libdrm, Mesa, xorg-server, and a slew of driver updates. Also, there is no *upgrade* path with the removal of xcb-xlib. That about cover it? I miss anything? -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
