On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 19:26:43 +0100 "Armin K." <[email protected]> wrote:
> I was thinking about upgrading wireless-tools for first. Now, I see two > version available. > > The latest stable version of Wireless Tools is version 29 > > The main features of the latest beta is support for non-ASCII ESSIDs > (such as localised ESSID), support for displaying Scanning Capabilities, > slightly bigger scan buffer, fixing minor bug iwconfig parser and minor > enhancement to ifrename : > > Wireless Tools version 30-pre9 (beta) > > I was thinking about using latest beta version because of such new > features. Big distros already use that one, and I personaly don't see > any issues with it. What do you think? Which one should I upgrade to? I use 29. In BLFS we use the current stable version unless there is a compelling case to use something else. Eg with Pango, we currently use a development version because we wanted to put gtk+-3 in the book and it's not possible to compile gtk+-3 with the current stable version of Pango. Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
