Pierre Labastie wrote: > Coming to what is needed for automating the book (I do > not mean automating the building of a system, but rather > being able to automate testing), one thing which is > really hard to deal with is the fact that there are several > (sometimes incompatible) options on the same footing > in the instructions.
Pierre, I appreciate what you are trying to do, but I might suggest that it is a little out of scope for LFS/BLFS. It's really up the the developers to test their packages and fix problems. What you suggest really reminds me of some of the goals of artificial intelligence, a really hard subject. There are just too many decisions to make in an LFS/BLFS build to do any significant testing beyond "do the instructions work". Even that is extremely difficult when you take optional dependencies into account. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
