On 04/04/12 09:56, DJ Lucas wrote: > On 04/03/2012 06:36 PM, Andrew Benton wrote: >> On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:07:23 +0100 >> "Armin K."<kre...@email.com> wrote: >> >>> Great. And then everyone told me how /etc/gnome and prefix other than >>> /usr can work. Well, yes they can. But there is a lot of additional >>> configuration that needs to be done, and also I still haven't found a >>> way to make policykit rules installed somewhere else than in /usr >>> available to the daemon. So, I am asking again. If everyone else agrees, >>> I'd like to drop GNOME_SYSCONFDIR - lot easier than making symlinks and >>> if possible GNOME_PREFIX or keep it with fat warning that it might break >>> things (that is if anyone wants to test if that works, I'm not going to >>> do that). >> As I've said before, I agree with you. I think GNOME_SYSCONFDIR should >> be /etc, GNOME_PREFIX should be /usr. >> >> Andy > Add a third. See the bugs I just posted in the libexec thread. All > related and avoidable by using /usr as the prefix and standard libexec dirs. > > -- DJ Lucas > > Add a forth. It seems to me that the people who are apposed to this are the people who don't really use Gnome? I agree with what you said. I prefer to have something that is fully functional rather than just buildable. Wayne.
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page