On 04/04/12 09:56, DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 04/03/2012 06:36 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
>> On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:07:23 +0100
>> "Armin K."<kre...@email.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> Great. And then everyone told me how /etc/gnome and prefix other than
>>> /usr can work. Well, yes they can. But there is a lot of additional
>>> configuration that needs to be done, and also I still haven't found a
>>> way to make policykit rules installed somewhere else than in /usr
>>> available to the daemon. So, I am asking again. If everyone else agrees,
>>> I'd like to drop GNOME_SYSCONFDIR - lot easier than making symlinks and
>>> if possible GNOME_PREFIX or keep it with fat warning that it might break
>>> things (that is if anyone wants to test if that works, I'm not going to
>>> do that).
>> As I've said before, I agree with you. I think GNOME_SYSCONFDIR should
>> be /etc, GNOME_PREFIX should be /usr.
>>
>> Andy
> Add a third. See the bugs I just posted in the libexec thread. All 
> related and avoidable by using /usr as the prefix and standard libexec dirs.
> 
> -- DJ Lucas
> 
> 
Add a forth. It seems to me that the people who are apposed to this are
the people who don't really use Gnome?
I agree with what you said. I prefer to have something that is fully
functional rather than just buildable.
Wayne.

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to