Andrew Benton wrote: > I'm reasonably confident that if I spent some time hacking at it I > could get Llvm to compile with Clang and without the static libs. > However, I lack the motivation to do it. To me, Llvm is a required dep > of Mesa. I install Llvm, Mesa is happy, I move on, end of. Do we need > to add Clang to Llvm? What does it do?
It was suggested in ticket 3359. http://llvm.org/ It's an alternative c/c++ compiler. I don't suppose we have to add it, but it was a request. It does build with static libs. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
