Ken Moffat wrote: > I lost the plot here! > > I thought you agreed above to keeping details of both these > packages in BLFS, in the short term, mirroring what is in LFS plus > pro tempore extra details for popt. Now you seem to be saying that > pkg-config and popt should instead point to lfs-svn ?
Actually, either option seems OK to me. Do you want to update the BLFS version of pkg-config or do you want me to do it? > Also, please note that in some of the previous mails I was under > the impression I'd changed deps to point to glib2 intstead of > pkg-config. You are correct, the change was from glib2 to > pkg-config. Unfortunately, some of these packages may be broken > now that the pkg-config we are using does not require a full install > of glib2. I agree. We will need to check that. Overall, I'm happier with pkg-config in LFS though. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
