On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:10:24PM +0100, Andrew Benton wrote: > > In this case I would argue that FFmpeg is more important than Transcode > (I don't install Transcode) and so if Transcode needs to be commented > out of the book for a few days while we find a fix then it's not the > end of the world. > Agreed, with regrets - I only started using transcode a couple of months ago, when I wanted to rip the audio from some DVDs to CD. It worked, but I failed to make a note of the exact commands I'd used, and I haven't managed to work out how I did it.
Somehow, I doubt transcode will reappear in the book : development was at berlios, and stopped some time ago, the site we were using is just a copy of what is/was at berlios (because that will be going away). Unfortunately, google is not very helpful for the *package* transcode, it just finds references to transcoding. ĸen, feeling very pessimistic again -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page