Randy McMurchy wrote: > Hi all, > > I realize this topic has been discussed in detail, and I agree that the > consensus is to go forward with our rolling updates to SVN. However, for > posterity's sake, I could cut a release (7.0?) just to have something in > the archives. I will update the BLFS home page to say that SVN is still > the resource to use, but it might be nice to have a version in the archives > that reflect where we stand right now. I have my notes and it would only > take a couple of hours to cut a release, PDF and all.
I think a tag for August-2012 would be OK, but I wouldn't call it a "release". A snapshot seems better. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
