On 10/29/2012 06:17 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Should we archive lprng? AFAICT, most of the programs it provides, lrp, > lpq, lprm, lpstat, etc are provided by cups and cups seems to be much > more active. > > -- Bruce >
Nothing against that -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
