--- Em dom, 4/11/12, Ken Moffat <[email protected]> escreveu:
> De: Ken Moffat <[email protected]>
> Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] gegl-0.2.0 and (gtk-?)doc
> Para: "BLFS Development List" <[email protected]>
> Data: Domingo, 4 de Novembro de 2012, 21:10
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 02:29:39PM
> -0800, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> >
> > I purposely have not installed GTK-Doc up to now, and
> it seems to be assumed there by some packages.
>
> Yes, many packages assume gtk-doc. I take the view
> that it is
> easier to just install it.
Agree. Wish the book would agree too, as it is only mentioned as Optional in
many, e.g. GTK:
Optional
Cups-1.6.1, DocBook-utils-0.6.14, gobject-introspection-1.34.1.1 and
GTK-Doc-1.18
A note or something could be done.
It is not "required" by gegl or dependencies, but it is probable it should be
as there is explicit mention to it in the install instructions:
/usr/share/gtk-doc, in
install -v -m644 docs/*.{css,html} /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/gegl &&
install -d -v -m755 /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/gegl/images &&
install -v -m644 docs/images/* /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/gegl/images
[]s,
Fernando
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
