--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K. <[email protected]> escreveu: > De: Armin K. <[email protected]> > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1 > Para: "BLFS Development List" <[email protected]> > Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 18:01 > Dana 13.11.2012 21:43, Fernando de > Oliveira je napisao: > > --- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K. escreveu: > > > >> De: Armin K. <[email protected]> > >> Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1 > >> Para: "BLFS Development List" > >> Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 16:33 > >> On 11/13/2012 06:01 PM, Fernando de > >> Oliveira wrote: > >>> > >>> Armin, I have it erased, glib-2.34.1 installed, > so > >> libsoup-2.40.1 has configured , mde and installed > properly. > >>> > >>> Thus, I have trimmed a copy of the whole build > log to > >> just the first unfinished one and attached, perhaps > it will > >> be enough. > >>> > >> > >> Apparently you were missing either glib pkg-config > files > >> (.pc ones) or > >> development headers. This was error in your > config.log > >> > >> configure:12019: checking for GLIB - version >= > 2.33.1 > >> configure:12152: result: no > >> configure:12180: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 > >> conftest.c >&5 > >> conftest.c:24:18: fatal error: glib.h: No such file > or > >> directory > >> > >> Glad you've fixed it. > > > > Thanks, Armin, for your attention. > > > > But they both are there (I left VMWLFS7.1 with libsoup > in its older > > version for a while, to discuss better this matter): > > > > $ find /usr -name glib.h -exec ls -lh {} \; -o > -name glib\*.pc -exec ls -lh {} \; 2>/dev/null > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3,3K Mai 8 2012 > /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib.h > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 392 Mai 8 2012 > /usr/lib/pkgconfig/glib-2.0.pc > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 579 Abr 17 2012 > /usr/lib/pkgconfig/glibmm-2.4.pc > > > > Problem was with the version, as I understood in the > first reference to > > the error. That is the reason I upgraded it, so fixed > the problem. > > > > My real question is related to the libsoup's "Required" > section in the > > book. > > > > If a package A cannot be built for some dependency B is > missing or > > obsolete, should not it be included as required > directly? > > > > I did not need to upgrade any other dependency, just > glib-2.32.3 to > > glib-2.34.1. > > > > []s, > > Fernando > > > > It really depends on a package. If you are upgrading, I > suggest that you > upgrade everything or you might get strange results at > runtime. > > Required packages ARE required, recommended are recommended > and you're > on your own if you don't install some of them. The > instructions are > originaly meant to pick up where LFS left off, so we set > dependencies > according to it.
Sorry, I have not made myself clear yet: I am just following the book. But libsoup could not be installed without glib. I think glib should be *required* in libsoup. It cannot be built without glib. At this moment, it is not in the required list in that page. Configure script looks for it. []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
