On 01/17/2013 03:36 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> Re: Message in Debian (reproduced below).
>
> See also:
>
> <https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2012-5519>
>
> where there is this:
>
> "Name CVE-2012-5519
> Description   CUPS 1.4.4, when running in certain Linux distributions
> such as Debian GNU/Linux, stores the web interface administrator key in 
> /var/run/cups/certs/0 using certain permissions, which allows local users in 
> the lpadmin group to read or write arbitrary files as root by leveraging the 
> web interface."
>
> I have:
>
> $ ls -l /var/run/cups/certs/0
> -r--r----- 1 root lpadmin 32 Jan 17 08:01 /var/run/cups/certs/0
>
> I only have read about it today. Gentoo, Debian, Mageia, Mandriva, Ubuntu,
> Red Hat (Fedora too?), all seem to be affected.
>
> Should we do anything about it?
>
> []s,
> Fernando
>
>>From root@vmwdebian Thu Jan 10 07:21:07 2013
> Envelope-to: root@vmwdebian
> Delivery-date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 07:21:07 -0300
> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 07:21:07 -0300
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Subject: =?utf-8?q?apt-listchanges=3A_not=C3=ADcias_para_VMWDebian?=
> To: root@vmwdebian
> From: root <root@vmwdebian>
>
> cups (1.4.4-7+squeeze2) stable-security; urgency=high
>
>    In order to mitigate a privilege escalation from the lpadmin to root
>    (CVE-2012-5519), the /etc/cups/cupsd.conf configuration file is split
>    in two configuration files:
>
>    * /etc/cups/cupsd.conf can be edited by members of the lpadmin group
>      through the cups web interface;
>    * /etc/cups/cups-files.conf can only be edited by root;
>
>    Many sensitive configuration statements can now only be set in
>    cups-files.conf. No statements have been moved automatically. Please
>    check the respective manpages.
>
>   -- Didier Raboud <o...@debian.org>  Sat, 29 Dec 2012 12:33:27 +0100
>

It appears that following patch fixes the issue:

http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/dl/cups/1.6.1-1/Split-configuration-files-STR-4223.patch

It's a bit big though and looks scary change to me. Can you test it and 
report any issues? Also, please create a bug on blfs bug tracker for 
this if that is not a problem for you.

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to