Ken Moffat wrote:
>   At some time in the past few months I was planning to upgrade
> ImageMagick, but the then-current release failed one of my tests.
> Specifically,
>   display /path/to/first-file.jpg /path/to/second-file.jpg
>
>   In a good version, this displays the first file, and then lets me
> click on 'next' in the menu (right mouse for menu) and go to to the
> next file.  It also lets me go to the previous entry, or resize.
>
>   On the more-recent version I was testing, 'next' stuck at the first
> image.  I was lacking time, so I didn't follow it up, or go to the
> version that was in the book, and I stuck with 6.7.8-6 which had
> previously passed my limited tests (display multiple files, mogrify
> jpegs to a different size).
>
>   For my current build, after realizing that the .la module files were
> needed, I decided to update to the version in BLFS, and downloaded
> it from anduin.  And found the same breakage.  So, ImageMagick has
> been broken for some time (sad, but not surprising - the last time I
> had a problem with 'display' it eventually got fixed, but some time
> after the first report on their forum).

anduin has:

ImageMagick-6.2.3-5.tar.bz2
ImageMagick-6.2.8-0.tar.bz2
ImageMagick-6.3.5-10.tar.bz2
ImageMagick-6.3.5-3.tar.bz2
ImageMagick/ImageMagick-6.7.3-10.tar.xz
ImageMagick-6.7.5-10.tar.xz
ImageMagick-6.7.8-6.tar.xz
/srv/ftp/BLFS/conglomeration/ImageMagick/ImageMagick-6.7.9-8.tar.xz
/srv/ftp/BLFS/conglomeration/ImageMagick/ImageMagick-6.8.2-8.tar.bz2
/srv/ftp/BLFS/conglomeration/ImageMagick/ImageMagick-6.8.2-8.tar.xz
/srv/ftp/BLFS/conglomeration/ImageMagick/ImageMagick-6.8.2-9.tar.xz

>   But I'm surprised nobody else hads noticed this.  Are you all using
> something else ?  I can't believe I'm the only one using display to
> review a series of images (photos) when I'm selecting them for
> processing and upload.

Generally, I just use gimp.  I tried using display on a 3932x4656 image 
and it was very slow (20 seconds to open) and I couldn't do anything 
with it.  Gimp was much faster and usable.  Even konqueror (I rarely use 
any file manager) gave me a scrollable image in less than a second.  I'm 
not sure what I'd use for a lot of thumbnails.

   -- Bruce
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to