Armin K. wrote:
> On 06/28/2013 08:45 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> <seg>
>> /etc/gtk-2.0,
>> - /usr/include/gail-1.0,
>> - /usr/include/gtk-2.0,
>> - /usr/include/gtk-unix-print-2.0,
>> + /usr/include/{gail-1.0,gtk-2.0,gtk-unix-print-2.0}
>
> Please don't do this, it's ugly for reading. I spent some time trying to
> remove this and now you put it back.
>
>> /usr/lib/gtk-2.0,
>> - /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/gail-libgail-util,
>> - /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/gtk,
>> - /usr/share/themes/Default,
>> - /usr/share/themes/Emacs and
>> - /usr/share/themes/Raleigh
>> + /usr/share/doc/gtk+->k2-version;,
>> + /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/{gail-libgail-util,gdk2,gtk2}, and
>> + /usr/share/themes/{Default,Emacs,Raleigh}
>> </seg>
>> </seglistitem>
>> </segmentedlist>
For a source perspective, your version is easier to read, but from a
rendered perspective, it's not. The problem is a long list of very
similar directory names and it's hard to visualize the similar vs
dissimilar parts in the rendered book.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
