On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 03:48:31PM +0200, Armin K. wrote:
>
> It appears your udev fails to do the work. cardx node permissions should
> be 660 and owned by root:video by default (set by udev)
>
> $ ls -l /dev/dri/card*
> crw-rw----+ 1 root video 226, 0 Aug 2 14:41 /dev/dri/card0
> crw-rw----+ 1 root video 226, 1 Aug 2 14:41 /dev/dri/card1
>
They are, and I'm in the video group. I've found the mesa-users
list, I'll take it there.
> >
> > For 9.2, with my configure options, I got a message that radeonsi
> > and r600g require libelf. Found that, straight CMMI but no obvious
> > way to prevent it installing static lib (and uses instroot instead
> > of DESTDIR - how many other variations are there ;-). I see that
> > arch uses elfutils from fedora-hosted, but that looks equally messy.
> > Do you need either of these, or is it just my "try everything"
> > config of Mesa-9.2 ?
> >
> > ĸen
> >
>
> I just added elfutils few minutes ago. Yes, it is *necesary* for both
> r600 and radeonsi, at least for my setup (which is more or less
> identical to one in LFS).
>
> $ ldd /usr/lib{,32}/dri/{r600,radeonsi}_dri.so
> /usr/lib/dri/r600_dri.so:
> linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007fff2b1ff000)
> libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0x00007ffa903bd000)
> libffi.so.6 => /usr/lib/libffi.so.6 (0x00007ffa901b4000)
> libelf.so.1 => /usr/lib/libelf.so.1 (0x00007ffa8ff9e000)
> libexpat.so.1 => /usr/lib/libexpat.so.1 (0x00007ffa8fd75000)
> libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007ffa8fb59000)
> libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00007ffa8f954000)
> libdrm.so.2 => /usr/lib/libdrm.so.2 (0x00007ffa8f748000)
> libdrm_radeon.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdrm_radeon.so.1 (0x00007ffa8f53c000)
> libLLVM-3.3.so => /usr/lib/libLLVM-3.3.so (0x00007ffa8dc61000)
> libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007ffa8d95e000)
> libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x00007ffa8d660000)
> libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00007ffa8d2b2000)
> libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007ffa8d09c000)
> /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007ffa91034000)
>
I didn't build radeonsi, but my r600_dri.so uses the same except
that my libelf is libelf.so.0.
Thanks for the reply.
ĸen
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
