On 08/12/2013 12:16 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Armin K. wrote: >> On 08/12/2013 11:54 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> [email protected] wrote: >>>> Author: krejzi >>>> Date: Mon Aug 12 02:38:43 2013 >>>> New Revision: 11618 >>>> >>>> Log: >>>> fixes to qt5 xml formatting >>> >>>> -./configure -prefix /usr \ >>>> - -sysconfdir /etc/xdg \ >>>> - -bindir /usr/lib/qt5/bin \ >>>> - -headerdir /usr/include/qt5 \ >>>> - -archdatadir /usr/lib/qt5 \ >>>> - -datadir /usr/share/qt5 \ >>>> - -docdir /usr/share/doc/qt5 \ >>>> +./configure -prefix /usr \ >>>> + -sysconfdir /etc/xdg \ >>>> + -bindir /usr/lib/qt5/bin \ >>>> + -headerdir /usr/include/qt5 \ >>>> + -archdatadir /usr/lib/qt5 \ >>>> + -datadir /usr/share/qt5 \ >>>> + -docdir /usr/share/doc/qt5 \ >>>> -translationdir /usr/share/qt5/translations \ >>>> - -examplesdir /usr/share/doc/qt5/examples \ >>>> + -examplesdir /usr/share/doc/qt5/examples \ >>> >>> You really think that is more readable? >>> >>> -- Bruce >>> >> >> Same as with any other package. It's just that others have = in >> --prefix=/path ... so you can't align them like you did with this one. >> Yet no one ever complained about readibility. > > If I could align the = signs, I'd do it, but it's not allowed by the > syntax. > > I didn't complain, I fixed it, just like I align the backslashes. > > -- Bruce > >
The aligning might be wrong if you ask me. Just try to re-run the last command from history by pressing up arrow (the last command being the configure line), you'll see tons of spaces between parameters making it next impossible to interpret it correctly. I don't want to imagine how that would look if you also had spaces between the parameter name and the actual parameter. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
