On 18/08/13 00:20, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: > On 17/08/13 12:57, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> Em 16-08-2013 20:44, Wayne Blaszczyk escreveu: >>> On 17/08/13 04:51, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >>>> Em 16-08-2013 15:32, BLFS Trac escreveu: >>>>> #3973: LibreOffice-4.1.0: troubles with dictionaries, help and languages >>>>> support >>>>> --------------------+---------------------- >>>>> Reporter: fo | Owner: fo >>>>> Type: defect | Status: closed >>>>> Priority: normal | Milestone: current >>>>> Component: BOOK | Version: SVN >>>>> Severity: normal | Resolution: fixed >>>>> Keywords: | >>>>> --------------------+---------------------- >>>>> Changes (by fo): >>>>> >>>>> * status: new => closed >>>>> * resolution: => fixed >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> This was too big for this junior editor. Please, check if that is >>>> allright, when revision 11640 appears in the -book list. >>>> >>> >>> I think there is a typo on the last instruction? >>> cp -vR dictionaries/en/* /usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions/dict-pt-BR >>> should be >>> cp -vR dictionaries/pt_BR/* /usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions/dict-pt-BR >>> Apart from that, well done. >> >> Thank you, Wayne. Fixed at revision 11641. Had to reformat some lines >> and added a verbose to chmod. >> >>> Do these fixes fix the neon latest version issue? >> >> No, I do not think so. >> >> I have downloaded the patch from gentoo, suggested by Armin. In Fedora, >> they do differently, I had the impression they just switch to internal >> neon, and make a joke, about who was responsible for the modification to >> neon bring the problems. >> >> However, have not hit the bug, because neon in the dev machine is older. >> I was considering including it, but two things came to mind: first, like >> Armin, I have not had a clear enough feedback of that user with the >> problem; second, there was already too many things to test and edit. >> Also, I was in doubt if Armin was intending to do it, himself. Perhaps I >> should install the new version of neon and try everything, maybe tomorrow? >> >> Have you (or anyone reading this) tested the patch? >> > > No I haven't, but I'll run it over night and report back. > > Wayne. >
The Gentoo patch worked fine. libreoffice-4.1.0.4-neon-build.patch md5sum: 0377797c1b2346223205d04af2d12faa The patch instruction was: patch -Np0 -i ../libreoffice-4.1.0.4-neon-build.patch and was done before the poppler patch. Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
