On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:51:30AM +0200, Igor Živković wrote: > On 2013-10-21 04:18, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > Ken Moffat wrote: > >> Ploughing on through the deps for things I haven't yet built with > >> make-4.0, I came to ibus. > >> > > > > I concur that it's not needed. The same for libgee. They both can be > > archived. > > I personally don't care about desktop environments but libgee is needed > for LXDE which is why I restored it. That was at GNOME removal time when > we discussed which libs to leave in the book. >
I'd forgotten you said that, but I now remember. At that time I had assumed LXDE was in, or was going to be in, the book - I knew nothing about it and assumed it was a single package. Now I look at it, I see there are more than 20 packages: http://sourceforge.net/projects/lxde/files/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/pcmanfm/files/ What caused you to notice ibus is needed for LXDE ? I'm having difficulty understanding why keeping this one package is beneficial for LXDE users. Thanks. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, dieses Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
