Em 30-10-2013 15:44, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
> Igor Živković wrote:
>> On 2013-10-30 18:46, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> libsigc++ is a gnome package, but we are using an odd numbered minor
>>> version (2.3.1 2012-10-18). The most recent even numbered version is
>>> 2.2.11 (2012-09-23).
>>>
>>> My question here is whether libsigc++ follows the common
>>> even-stable/odd-development pattern. If so, is there a specific reason
>>> we are using a development release?
>>>
>>> Note: I just found libsigc++-2.3.1.news which says:
>>>
>>> 2.3.1 (unstable): ...
>>>
>>> So that answers my first question, but the second remains.
>>
>> I don't think anything in the book requires the unstable version but I
>> bet the newest GNOME depends on it. If that is so, my question would be:
>> should we still cater to packages that we already decided to remove from
>> the book?
>
> We should keep with the latest stable version of a package if the
> package is needed by other apps. Right now I see that libsigc is
> referenced by cdrdao and cairomm. cairomm is used by pangomm which in
> turn is used by gtkmm{2,3). etc.
>
> Bottom line is that we need libsigc. I don't think we need to go back
> to the stable version, but we also don't need to update unless a new
> stable version is released.
Just checked and
http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/gnome/core/3.10/3.10.1/sources/libsigc++-2.3.1.tar.xz
is part of gnome-3.10.1, as you can see. To be consistent, I think we
need to update.
--
[]s,
Fernando
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
