On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 02:32:08PM +0100, Igor Živković wrote: > On 12/24/2013 12:45 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > > > > Before your post and due to Pierre's reply, I decided to do a last > > investigation. Not sure if it concludes pcre should or not be > > "Optional". All applications installed by wireshark-1.10.5 are linked to > > pcre directly. > > Not really. You're seeing libpcre.so in ldd output because > libglib-2.0.so links to it. > > A better tool for such purposes is, for example, scanelf from pax-utils: > I haven't come across pax-utils before. Added to my "to look at" list. The thread has been educational - thanks.
Seasonal felicitations to you all. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, dieses Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
