Em 15-01-2014 04:20, Igor Živković escreveu: > On 01/15/2014 01:41 AM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> >> The point (or the dumb question, forgive me for not knowing much about >> this) is: although it is easy to see "whois" is linked to libidn, I >> cannot notice any difference with or without. Would you an example, >> please? With an example, I would come to first above: being useful, >> should it not be recommended? >> >> $ ldd /usr/bin/whois | grep libidn >> libidn.so.11 => /usr/lib/libidn.so.11 (0xb76f1000) >> >> $ scanelf -F "%f: %n" /usr/bin/whois >> FILE NEEDED >> whois: libidn.so.11,libc.so.6 >> >> $ diff whois-google.com-before-idn.log whois-google.com-after-idn.log >> 266c266 >> < >>> Last update of whois database: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:15:54 UTC <<< >> --- >>>>>> Last update of whois database: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:20:27 UTC <<< > > > For example: whois кыргызстан.icom.museum without libidn gives: > > % The selected character encoding "US-ASCII" is not able to represent > > And with libidn: > > % Object "xn--80afmksoji0fc.icom.museum" NOT FOUND. >
OK, thanks. Got exactly what you wrote. Sorry for the noise. But it was good, I learned finally the usefulness of libidn. Have updated two systems to use it, now. I would recommend, but you know how clumsy I am in this matter. Hope I did not upset you with the comment in ffmpeg ticket, earlier this morning. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page