Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 08:01:07AM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> Em 17-02-2014 00:19, Ken Moffat escreveu:
>>>
>>> add MANDIR=/usr/share/man/man1 to the install for tree.
>>>
>>>   I can fix these in a few days, after I confirm that the fixes are
>>> correct.
>>>
>>> ĸen
>>>
>>
>> I used that, you even referred to, after, I was able to get the good
>> placement without it.
>>
>> $ tree DEST-tree-1.6.0
>> DEST-tree-1.6.0
>> └── usr
>>      ├── bin
>>      │   └── tree
>>      └── man
>>          └── man1
>>              └── tree.1
>>
>> This is without the mandir override. Do you get it different?
>>
>   I too got /usr/man/man1/tree.1 - the point is that I've dropped the
> /usr/man -> /usr/share/man symlink.

And I've dropped it from LFS too.  The symlink will not be a part of 
LFS-7.5.

   -- Bruce

It took Armin's post a few
> weeks ago to make me realise _why_ I should care : I can remember
> Randy fixing this on something a long time ago, and my reaction at
> that time was "not worth doing, we have the symlink".
>
>   For official 7.5 (unlike systemd-7.5) it is probably optional.
>
> ĸen
>


-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to