Em 04-03-2014 13:32, Armin K. escreveu:
> On 03/04/2014 05:06 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> Em 04-03-2014 12:05, Armin K. escreveu:
>>> I've missed one step (for future reference), see below:
>>>
>>> On 03/04/2014 04:04 PM, Armin K. wrote:
>>>> On 03/04/2014 03:33 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>>>>> Em 03-03-2014 11:30, Armin K. escreveu:
>>>>>> On 03/03/2014 03:06 PM, thomas kaeding wrote:
>>>>>>> This might be important for anyone wanting to build pygtk.
>>>>>>> It's a patch to pygobject.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://bug668522.bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=209543
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Forwarding to blfs-dev since it's a blfs package, not lfs. Be sure to
>>>>>> subscribe to the list before replying.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The git repository contains 15 patches for pygobject after the last 2.28
>>>>>> release, so I propose that all should be included in the book in a
>>>>>> single patch. Note that the patch from that bug and the one that is
>>>>>> currently in the blfs will also be the part of that patch, given that
>>>>>> all fixes are included.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://git.gnome.org/browse/pygobject/log/?h=pygobject-2-28
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know what exactly to do. Please, someone could have a look at
>>>>> this?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> git clone git://git.gnome.org/pygobject -b pygobject-2-28
>>>> cd pygobject
>>> git format-patch -15
>>>> cat 00*.patch > ../pygobject.patch
>>>> cd ..
>>>> wget
>>>> http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/pygobject/2.28/pygobject-2.28.6.tar.xz
>>>> tar xf pygobject-2.28.6.tar.xz
>>>> mv pygobject-2.28.6 b
>>>> cp -a b a
>>>> cd b
>>>> patch -Np1 -i ../pygobject.patch
>>>> cd ..
>>>> diff -Naur a b > pygobject-2.28.6-git_fixes-1.patch
>>>> sed -i "/diff -Naur/d" pygobject-2.28.6-git_fixes-1.patch
>>>>
>>>> Final patch is in attachment.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Thanks, Armin,
>>
>> 1. That patch you attached can be used, otr I need to redo the process
>> you tought me?
>>
>
> Yes, this is the final patch. I've included commands here so they might
> help you later.
>
>> 2. The patch is to be included and keep also the one already in the book?
>>
>
> This patch includes the one that's currently in the book.
>
>> 3. Target is 7.5, or I can do it a little later for 7.6?
>>
>>
>>
>
> Your choice. It contains bugfixes only so I believe it's suitable for
> 7.5 too.
>
Didn't you get a problem, when testing the patch?
Only if I first apply pygobject-2.28.6-introspection-1.patch that is in
the book, then, apply pygobject-2.28.6-git_fixes-1.patch, it works.
With just
patch -Np1 -i ../pygobject-2.28.6-git_fixes-1.patch, "make" breaks with
messages:
{{{
pygi-repository.c: In function '_wrap_g_irepository_require':
pygi-repository.c:92:15: warning: variable 'typelib' set but not used
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
GTypelib *typelib;
^
CC _gi_la-pygi-info.lo
pygi-info.c: In function '_pygi_info_new':
pygi-info.c:165:14: error: 'GI_INFO_TYPE_ERROR_DOMAIN' undeclared (first
use in this function)
case GI_INFO_TYPE_ERROR_DOMAIN:
^
pygi-info.c:165:14: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only
once for each function it appears in
pygi-info.c:135:5: warning: enumeration value 'GI_INFO_TYPE_INVALID_0'
not handled in switch [-Wswitch]
switch (info_type)
^
pygi-info.c: In function '_pygi_g_type_info_size':
pygi-info.c:484:22: error: 'GI_INFO_TYPE_ERROR_DOMAIN' undeclared (first
use in this function)
case GI_INFO_TYPE_ERROR_DOMAIN:
^
pygi-info.c:448:13: warning: enumeration value 'GI_INFO_TYPE_INVALID_0'
not handled in switch [-Wswitch]
switch (info_type) {
^
pygi-info.c: In function 'pygi_g_struct_info_is_simple':
pygi-info.c:863:26: error: 'GI_INFO_TYPE_ERROR_DOMAIN' undeclared (first
use in this function)
case GI_INFO_TYPE_ERROR_DOMAIN:
^
pygi-info.c:835:17: warning: enumeration value 'GI_INFO_TYPE_INVALID_0'
not handled in switch [-Wswitch]
switch (info_type) {
^
Makefile:528: recipe for target '_gi_la-pygi-info.lo' failed
make[3]: *** [_gi_la-pygi-info.lo] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory
'/home/fernando/tmp/paco-build-2014.03.04-16h40m46s/pygobject-2.28.6/gi'
Makefile:690: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
'/home/fernando/tmp/paco-build-2014.03.04-16h40m46s/pygobject-2.28.6/gi'
Makefile:615: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory
'/home/fernando/tmp/paco-build-2014.03.04-16h40m46s/pygobject-2.28.6'
Makefile:376: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 2
}}}
which seems exactly the fix needed from
pygobject-2.28.6-introspection-1.patch.
Unfortunately, I do not feel we can end the discussion before 7.5 is
released.
My doubts, first, is this new patch required or optional, because the
other one is optional? second, should it be a second patch, not a
replacement patch?
--
[]s,
Fernando
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
