On 04/13/14 05:17, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While icedtea has a new version, OpenJDK is still at 1.7.0_51. My concern is
> that I built new binary JDK's, but that in our naming scheme, they should have
> the same version number as the previous ones.
> How should I name them?
> - OpenJDK-1.7.0.51-{i686,x86_64}-bin-2
> - OpenJDK-1.7.0.51-2-{i686,x86_64}-bin
> - upload them with the same name as the prebious one? (not good, since the
> checksum changes)
> - not upload them at all
>
> Regards
>
> Pierre
>
Hmm? 2.4.7 is 1.7 u55b14:changeset 1cffa74f89e7 in /hg/release/icedtea7-2.4 details:http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/release/icedtea7-2.4?cmd=changeset;node=1cffa74f89e7 author: Andrew John Hughes<gnu_and...@member.fsf.org> date: Wed Apr 16 05:19:28 2014 +0100 Set to u55b14. 2014-04-15 Andrew John Hughes<gnu_and...@member.fsf.org> * Makefile.am: (JDK_UPDATE_VERSION): Bump to 55 to match upstream. (BUILD_VERSION): Bump to b14 to match upstream. Something odd with your packaging? --DJ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
