Em 25-05-2014 18:24, Ken Moffat escreveu: > On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 03:35:33PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> Em 25-05-2014 15:10, Ken Moffat escreveu:
>>> >> >> Thanks, ĸen. I don't know. It seems that we need this solution, instead >> of the one in the book. Do you prefer the patches, instead of the sed >> suggested by Bruce? Also, I preferred the solution by Pierre, because >> reading his post, I thought it was better in terms of speed. Sorry. Apologies to Pierre. He was the one who suggested the sed's in the book for gst-plugins-base. >> > > I think that Bruce suggested a sed for lame ? Yes, but I was referring to the other ones, by Pierre. > I'm running with > that, but have not tested it at runtime. At the moment that box is > having another attempt to backup my windoze system (realised I > needed to remove my recent large HDtracks.com downloads, and from > ntfs3g I only mount windows as r/o - talk about up/down/up/down, I'd > forgotten what a pain that is ;) > > For the gst-base plugins, does "i686-gcc-4.9.0-1.patch" sound like > a decent name ? For me, yes. Oh, no, by the book, should be your choice with some replacements: "packgnamewithpkgversion-i686_gcc_4_9_0-1.patch >> Please, whatever you decide, submit the patches and fix the book, if you >> do not mind. >> > > OK. >> And please, mark in the ticket that the gst-base, is partially fixed. >> I'm the two versions of FF that you updated behind. No FF in the new dev >> box, only Midori and the one from gnome. >> >> I am doing something for the book and with a small headache, so would >> prefer not doing it myself. >> > > Fine, it won't be today, and perhaps not tomorrow. For headaches I > have no general advice, but best wishes. Thanks. A little better, after some paracetamol. I think I am starting to have trouble with chocolates (eat it once or twice a week). > > ĸen > -- []s, Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
