Le 22/07/2014 17:16, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : > Pierre Labastie wrote: >> Le 20/07/2014 18:05, [email protected] a écrit : >>> Author: bdubbs >>> Date: Sun Jul 20 09:05:48 2014 >>> New Revision: 13511 >>> >>> Log: >>> Split out packages.ent from general.ent similar to the way LFS is >>> organized. >>> >> BTW, what is the policy about lfs-version-* in general.ent? Should they >> be the versions in LFS SVN or in LFS stable? >> If the former, they should be updated. > > I'm not sure what you are asking here. For the blfs book, the svn version > should point to the development version of lfs and the release version of the > blfs book should point to the associated lfs release. > > -- Bruce I've seen that several lfs-version-* entities in BLFS development were lagging behind the development version of LFS, and was preparing to update them, but then I thought that maybe they shouldn't be updated. That's why I asked.
Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
