On 24-07-2014 20:22, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 05:45:41PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>
>> Seems reasonable.  I haven't seen your change, but I hope you mention the
>> security issues openssl has had recently.  AFAIK, only the current (as of
>> today) version of openssl should be used.
>>
>  It went in just now, before I read your reply.  I think that any of
> 1.0.1h, 1.0.0m, 0.9.8za (latest versions from
> http://www.openssl.org/news/ ) should be fine.
> 
>  I used the phrase "the latest version of any currently maintained
> version of openssl should be satisfactory if already installed" with
> italics, i.e. <emphasis/> on "currently maintained".  That is on the
> firefox and xulrunner pages, in the second notes.
> 
> ĸen
> 

ĸen,

Want to do the same addition to Thunderbird, but not sure. I am thinking
in removing /usr/lib/python2.7/lib-dynload/_ssl.so to test the necessity.

-- 
[]s,
Fernando
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to