On 24-07-2014 20:22, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 05:45:41PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> >> Seems reasonable. I haven't seen your change, but I hope you mention the >> security issues openssl has had recently. AFAIK, only the current (as of >> today) version of openssl should be used. >> > It went in just now, before I read your reply. I think that any of > 1.0.1h, 1.0.0m, 0.9.8za (latest versions from > http://www.openssl.org/news/ ) should be fine. > > I used the phrase "the latest version of any currently maintained > version of openssl should be satisfactory if already installed" with > italics, i.e. <emphasis/> on "currently maintained". That is on the > firefox and xulrunner pages, in the second notes. > > ĸen >
ĸen, Want to do the same addition to Thunderbird, but not sure. I am thinking in removing /usr/lib/python2.7/lib-dynload/_ssl.so to test the necessity. -- []s, Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
