Le 12/01/2015 14:31, Pierre Labastie a écrit :
Le 12/01/2015 11:44, Fernando de Oliveira a écrit :
There has been increasing demonstrations of disliking what I do in BLFS
by almost everybody, either in form or in quality.
Some of them seem to judge that I should not be an editor, because of
lack of knowledge: Chris and William Harrington are clearly between
them.
If this is what all editors think, I would like to be informed, in order
to leave.
I do like many people here and very much. I do like editing BLFS to keep
it up to date.
I would like to know if I'm still considered qualified.
Thanks.
Fernando,
Please, stay with us. Or better said, allow us to stay with you, since
you have been the principal editor lately.
I admire the pace at which you are able to do updates. I'd like to be
able to be as fast as you, but I can't (to much regular work ATM,
anyway: I do not even build anything from scratch ;-).
I do not remember what W Harrington has said, but I have seen comments
from Chris about Poppler. I think you should just take them as people
asking "why are you doing this way?" and not as people saying "you are
doing the wrong way". Don't forget that "svn blame" is the same
command as "svn praise", and means "svn annotate"...
Pierre
Forgot to remove the SPAM header in the preceding message, sorry!
Pierre
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
