On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 09:20:36AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > That's true, but if you are going to build llvm, you might as well do the > optional parts at the same time. The only reason I can think of to not do > the optional parts is if you are trying to build a minimal system. > A lot of machines are small, and slow. LFS and BLFS is above all about building a system the way you want it. For someone who is not developing C or C++ code on the system, clang is an overhead we can do without.
ĸen -- Nanny Ogg usually went to bed early. After all, she was an old lady. Sometimes she went to bed as early as 6 a.m. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
