Ken Moffat wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:31:08AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
On 22.07.2015 23:55, Ken Moffat wrote:
[ 2%] Generating kbookmarkmerger.1
file:/opt/kf5/share/kf5/kdoctools/customization/dtd/kdex.dtd:102:
warning: failed to load external entity
"file:/opt/kf5/share/kf5/kdoctools/customization/dtd/searched_dir-NOTFOUND/docbookx.dtd"
%DocBookDTD;
^
Entity: line 1:
%DocBookDTD;
^
The message in kdelibs4support comes from
cmake/FindDocBookXML4.cmake which seems to be looking for
docbookx.dtd and by default is looking for a 4.2 version (in the
directory name). Fixed by adding
-DDocBookXML_FIND_VERSION=4.5
when running cmake on kdelibs4support.
I explicitly use a sed for that. Not sure if it was and if not, why not
it was merged to the main book when KF5 section was added.
But, if that cmake option works, I'd be happy to use that instead of
a sed.
I didn't need either the sed or the -D option. Perhaps the configuration in
docbook-xml-4.5 wasn't done. See the part that starts as
for DTDVERSION in 4.1.2 4.2 4.3 4.4
...
done
Unless I am misunderstanding those commands, all they are doing is
updating /etc/xml/catalog. The cmake script looks for a versioned
directory containing docbookx.dtd. Specifically, a 4.2 versioned
directory.
Certainly, I don't think we have altered those commands in years,
and I originally had to paste them all to get things working. And
yes, I did review them yesterday, and checked that my catalog
contains a 4.2 conversion. But the catalog is not being used in
this case.
Do you have a log which shows cmake found it, or does "I didn't need
it" mean that none of the kf5 packages which you built had a problem ?
If the latter, kf5 base-apps is not in either book.
The only apps I have done on my current development system are those in
the book. I did do Plasma on a different system, but that was a very
rough test that I did without scripts. That means I didn't make any
logs for that.
The Plasma I built was version 5.3.1. I see that 5.3.2 was available on
June 25th.
I had two main complaints that I recall. The first is the time display
for the digital (but not analog) clock being in GMT that we discussed
earlier. The second was a very slow startup time. From startx to a
usable screen was over 30 seconds -- maybe a minute. On my development
system xfce or lxde is on the order of one second.
There may be some other things, but I did not explore a lot.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
