Em 11-08-2015 17:07, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
> Em 11-08-2015 07:33, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
>> Em 11-08-2015 06:27, Tim Tassonis escreveu:
>>> On 07.08.2015 16:41, Tim Tassonis wrote:
>>>> Hi all
>>>>
>>>> There is a small typo in the soundtouch chapter in the blfs book:
>>>>
>>>> The program to be installed is called
>>>>
>>>> soundstretch
>>>>
>>>> The book calls it
>>>>
>>>> soundstrech
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards
>>>> Tim
>>>>
>>>
>>> Just a quick reminder that this has not yet been fixed.
>>> There is currently no public big tracker, so I could add the bug myself,
>>> right?
>>>
>>> Kind regards
>>> Tim
>>>
>>
>> Sorry, Tim, forgot that. Will do in my next commit.
>>
>> There is a bug tracker:
>>
>> http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/report
>>
>> You are welcome to register an account.
>>
>> However, normally we don't add small typos there. But if we forget
>> something, it's better to add there.
>>
>> Please, not in present case. I'll fix it, as I wrote above.
>>
>> Sorry, again.
>
> Thanks, Tim.
>
> Fixed at r16341.
>
For old subject:
Tim, have you tried to register to Track? Any problem, please tell me
privately, and we will try to solve it. Asking, because ISTR a post
about about some restrictions.
New subject:
The reason for the move:
The utility "soundstretch" is what I use to test new versions of
SoundTouch. I process a .wav file, converted from .flac just for this,
as the test for a new update in the book:
{{{
soundstretch \
~/sshfs/blfs/01_-_Die_Kunst_der_Fuge_BWV_1080_-_Contrapunctus_1.wav \
/tmp/destinationfile.wav -tempo=-25.3 -pitch=3.5
}}}
and find it very useful.
During a meeting, some two years ago, I needed to watch an annoying .ppt
presentation with audio sounding like a cartoon. Soundstretch would have
saved the trouble.
Thus, I think that soundstretch is at least as useful as libSoundTouch.
--
[]s,
Fernando
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
