On 08/09/2015 16:33, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Em 08-09-2015 10:44, Pierre Labastie escreveu: >> On 08/09/2015 15:10, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >>> Em 08-09-2015 09:18, Pierre Labastie escreveu: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I've hit the bug reported at >>>> https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22661. Our friend Armin has found >>>> a workaround, which I am going to try: >>>> >>>> sed -ri "/ifeq.*CompilerTargetArch/s#i386#i686#g" >>>> projects/compiler-rt/make/platform/clang_linux.mk >>>> >>>> I'll test and let you know. >>>> >>>> Pierre >>>> >>>> >>> Pierre, >>> >>> I didn't update the tests statistics nor tried to see how the docs >>> install should be changed. Had here a todo for those two issues. >>> >>> The tests I had done before I changed something (can't remember anymore) >>> and ISTR they were fine, so that I didn't wnat to use previous >>> statistics I had. Tickets were accumulating, and I decided to delay the >>> fixes. >>> >>> Please, would you mind to address those two? >>> >>> I know, I'm asking too much things from you, but we are in a hurry, now >>> and I'm trying to complete the other tickets soon, because some will be >>> necessary for the tags. >> OK. Let me have the following ordered todo list: >> 1) Fix doxygen, sane-backends, 32 bit llvm instructions (within an hour >> or so). See also the r600 headache in another thread. >> 2) Update OpenJDK. It is always a lengthy process, because upstream >> keep changing details, the build/test is 100+SBU, and both a 32 bit and >> & 64 bit binary have to be built to be hosted on anduin. BTW, I decided >> to include your download instructions for now. But we should maybe >> discuss about our policy when upstream packaging is poor: using git >> or hg or whatever VCS they use can save some headaches. Anyway, >> this is a discussion for 7.9 (or 8.0 ?). >> 3) Come back to llvm statistics and docs. >> 4) Build LFS-7.8-rc1 and do as many tests as possible... >> >> Pierre > > Thank you very very much for accepting number 3, besides the others. > > You see I was having a couple of packages with big troubles (there was > another one that was taking my time, IIRC), and I felt pressed to close > those tickets and do the accumulating ones, which I'm still doing. >
As all the other devs, I see what you accomplish and I am very impressed. I'll be happy to help for this matter. Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
